[fse-esf] Article on the Attack of Black Blocj in Athens
Simó Endre
drsimoendre at freemail.hu
Sun May 14 19:20:11 CEST 2006
It is necessary to defend ourselves phisically from the extremists, at
the same time we must defend the scale of values we are proposing
regarding a new society in which human and social rights could be
implemented in Democracy and Freedom this is the conclusion of an
article I have written and which was published on Saturday in the
weekend supplement of the hungarian daily newspaper Nepszabadsag
by the title The attack of Black Block (in Athens).
During the debate on the situation we have made in Athens
suddenly after the big demonstration of 100 thousand people, we have
all agreed, that the peaceful demonstrators marching on Alexandros
Avenue have been phisically aggressed. We have put the question: are
the Black Blocks composed by anarchists, fascists or anarcho-fascists?
Some of us have indignantly rejected the idea to define Black Block as
an extreme rightwing group, somebody has spoken about youngsters
fall into sin, by taking indirectly their defense. We could devide our
movement if we take position against them was told by a participant
at the debate. Some people considered that the methods of Black Block
were wrong, but their goals were the ours. Personally I thought, if it
was true, why did they attacked us, why did they launch new and new
attacks on the people demonstrating against the war - I have asked in
my article.
We are not alone with the opinion - continues the article - that Black
Block is not the fellow fighter of the european social movement. We
reject the theory of the comrades fall into sin, as Red Brigades have
been defined when they have kidnapped Aldo Moro in 1979. We have
been shocked by listening in Athens the opinion of a representative
from Italy, telling us, that the problem of our movement was to
be sqeamish because of distinguishing between bad and good
methods, bad and good tools, while the most important was to achieve
our social goals (independently of the methods). We think, at the
contrary, that the macchiavellistic spirit present in our movement is
impeading to understand that the choosen method of the social fight
cannot be separated from the social goal we are pursuing. The method
reflects and predicts which kind of social goal would be. By speaking
of so called terrorism, by denying the undeniable and justifying the
unjustifiable pose the problem of the future: how do we conceive the
New Society, what kind of Another World do we want and do we
consider possible. Why would the new world be different from the
existing one, if unhuman methods, unecceptable violence, barbarism
would continue? It will only be better if we fight for another solution:
for braking the infernal circle of War and Terrorism, by refusing to justify
each with the other. We must do this starting from another etichal
basis, in the name of humanist values guiding us. I have agreed with
an another italian friend calling our attention to the fact, that Black
Blocks have used our ranks and our flags to launch their attacks on us -
I have written in my article, among others.
Budapest, 14 May 2006
_______________________________________________________________________________
Nyerj lakást! - 4 jó válasszal most lakást nyerhet az [origo] Ingatlaqn rovat játékával!
http://ingatlan.origo.hu/index.html
More information about the FSE-ESF
mailing list