[fse-esf] Migrations : Report and proposal of mergers
Doug Holton
doug at abelard.org.uk
Fri Mar 17 11:39:58 CET 2006
The EPA in Vienna quite clearly took the view that the issue of
children and minors should be prioritised.
Now it seems that the only proposal on that subject (LDH, France 568)
is in limbo. Please correct me if I am wrong.
There is another issue on that proposal. Stop Deporting Children did
not propose a seminar on the subject because there already was one.
Instead we e-mailed the proposers (LDH, France (568). To discuss the
seminar. Our e-mail was not acknowledged.
We made our own proposal (535) about building a movement in defence of
migrants' rights in Europe. It seemed to us to be ridiculous not to
have a seminar that encourages us to discuss the issue and try to take
something concrete away from the ESF. When I made the point in
Frankfurt it seemed to me that everyone agreed.
It appears that we are being penalised for LDH's discourtesy and our
own efforts to behave in responsible way and try to help the process
by not proposing seminars that duplicate others.
I have had experience of the administrative problems associated with
the ESF and I wanted us to be as constructive as possible.
I e-mailed Marine the other day voicing precisely these concerns.
I honestly applaud the efforts of everyone to get the axis as well
organised as it is but I cannot agree to the proposals as they stand.
Please can we engage on this issue. Do we have to spend a lot of money
going to Athens to have this discussion?
best wishes
in solidarity
Doug Holton
> LDH, France (568) : “Mineurs migrants, accueil et difficultés
> sociales“.
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=864>
>
> - Stop Deporting Children, England (535)
On Friday, March 17, 2006, at 10:12 AM, Marine Gacem wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Here is our proposed list of mergers for issues about Migrations.
> This list comes from the discussions in the last AEP in Vienna and
> Frankfurt.
> (You will find the report of the meeting after the proposal of mergers
> (English, French and Italian
> versions of the report are available)
> For the moment, only two remarks have been done : first one concerned
> the issue on human traffic (Caritas europa ask for a specific seminar
> because of the huge number of
> participants from their european network) second one concerned the LDH
> (France) and his european partners who want to hold a specific seminar
> on Women and Asylum right. The others proposals of mergers seem to be
> accepted. We are waiting for everyone agreement. We stress that it is
> just a proposal.
> Next week we will send the list of the moderator for each seminar
> merged.
> best regards
>
> Marine Gacem : ep3 at reseau-ipam.org
>
> Nickos Nickisianis : nnikisia at bio.auth.gr
>
> Filippo Miraglia : miraglia at arci.it
>
> *******************************
>
>
> *DRAFT of migrations program / EBAUCHE du programme migrations*
>
> *_Eight first proposals (merged from the network) : _*
>
> *(The titles of the seminars are only to indicate the contents. They
> are not final statements)*
>
> *_ _**1. **European and National policies on borders control,
> externalisation, expulsion, detention camps and the freedom of
> movement and settlement (2 sessions)*
>
> *2. Right of Asylum*
>
> *3. Legalisation, fighting for papers for all. *
>
> *4. Social rights: access to social services, public education, health
> and housing*
>
> *5. Political rights and citizenship*
>
> *6. Labour and migration*
>
> *7. Human trafficking*
>
> *8. Migrants and development*
>
>
> Seminar 1 : *European and national policies on borders control,
> externalisation, expulsion, detention camps and the freedom of
> movement and settlement (2 sessions)*
>
> With
>
> - IPAM/Migreurop, France (532) : “Analyze and fight against
> the migratory European policies”.
>
> - CEAR, Spain (537): “Ceuta and Melilla; the Southern door to
> Europe. Presentation of the II World Social Forum on Migration (Spain,
> 22-24 June)".
>
> - _Secours catholique-caritas, France
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2048&&acti_list=acti_list>_
> (581) : “Safeguarding access to international protection: the EU South
> Border”.
>
> - Young democrats-Young left (549): “Fortress Europe fenced out
> precarious inside”.
>
> - ARCI, Italie (570): “Neo-colonialism and Apartheid within the
> Migration policies
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1390>“.
>
> - Information center militarization (562) : “Managing Migration:
> postmodern geopolitics?"
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1416>
>
> - Fédération des tunisiens pour une citoyenneté des deux rives
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2562&&acti_list=acti_list>,
> France (560): “Les politiques Européennes de l’immigration“
>
> - Network for political and social rights, Greece (558): “Lager,
> refugee detention camps; policies against refugees”.
>
> - Frassanito, Europe (550): “Freedom of movement against camps,
> borders and their externalisation
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1641>”.
>
> Seminar 2: *Right of Asylum*
>
> With
>
> - ARCI, Italie (545): “Externalization of the borders and
> negation of the right to asylum”
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1389>
>
> - Avusturya anadolu federasyonu (571): “No against alien’s
> deportation of migrants, asylum seakers, communists, islamists etc”
> (can be also added to sem.2)
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1389>
>
> - LDH, France (546): “Femmes, asile et immigration”
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1389>
>
> - Anadolu federasyonu : ”The new migrants and asylums law in
> Germany ” (without thematic area on the web site)
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1389>
>
> - Network for social support to immigrants and refugees, Greece (572):
> “
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> viewactivities.php?activity_id=1389>Political Asylum in the European
> Policies, criminalisation of Political Refugees
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1655>”
>
> - Young against racism in Europe, Greece (572): “The case of
> Bikongo Ramandhani - the scandalous EU and Greek government policies
> on political asylum seeker”
>
>
> Seminar 3: *Legalisation, fighting for papers for all*
>
> With
>
> - Greek social forum, Greece (586): “The fighting for the
> legaligalization and equal rights for the
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=903>
>
> immigrants
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=903>”
> (Can be also added to sem.4,5).
>
> - Campaign Genoa 2001, Greece (532): “Against Fortress Europe,open
> borders for immigrants and asylum seekers
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1052>”
> (Can also be added to sem. 1,2).
>
> - Frassanito Network, Europe (536): “Campaigning for legalisation,
> fighting for papers for al
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1642>l”.
>
> - Rouge, France (538) : “Construire la solidarité avec les immigrés
> extra-européens:égalité des droits, liberté de circulation“ (Can also
> be added to sem. 4,5).
>
> Seminar 4 : *Social rights : access to social services, public
> education, health and housing*
>
> - European Network for the right to health /People health movement,
> Europe (160): “Network for Health Part 3. - Thematic seminar ENRH-PHM
> - Access of the marginalised and the immigrants to the public health
> care services”
>
> - Hellenic league for human rights
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2073&&acti_list=acti_list>,
> Greece (543): “European immigration policies and human rights”
>
> - TRANSFORM: “Au dela de la solidarite avec les migrants. Migration et
> lutte social, la construction d’ une alternative altermondialiste“
>
> Seminar 5 : *Political rights and citizenship*
>
> - ACER, France (551): “Droit de vote et citoyenneté des résidents
> étrangers dans l'UE a)Droit de vote des résidents étrangers b)Place
> des élus étrangers ou d’origine non-communautaire c)Citoyenneté
> européenne de résidence d)Constitution d'un collectif “ (With spanish,
> austrian, italian and belgium partner)
>
> - Antiracist initiative of thessaloniki
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2568&&acti_list=acti_list>,
> Greece (599): “Social equation of migrants: strugles for social and
> political rights
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1665>”
> (Can also be added to sem. 4).
>
> - TRANSFORM : “Egalite des droits politiques et sociaux, contenu,
> lutte pour une citoyennete de residence“.
>
> Seminar 6 : *Labour and migration*
>
> - Frassanito Network, Europe (563): “Migrant labour and migrant
> struggles in the process of precariousness
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1643>”.
>
> - Confederazione generale italiana del lavoro, Italy (566): “Migration
> to bring about news strategies it TUs, North – South and East –
> West”.**
>
> - Sunday School for Migrants, Greece (552): “Immigrants, legislation,
> equal rights. Organization in the unions: we are parts of the same
> class” (Can also be added in sem. 3,4,5).**
>
> - TRANSFORM: “Migration et lutte sociale: le statut du salarie“.**
>
> Seminar 7 : *Human Traffic*
>
> - Secours catholique, France (578) : “Quelle cohérence des politiques,
> en Europe, pour lutter efficacement contre les trafics de femmes? Le
> rôle des organisations de la société civile”.
>
> - Neolaia Synaspismou-The Youth of Synaspismos
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2054&&acti_list=acti_list>,
> Greece (551) : “Human Trafficking: Aspects of a contemporary slave
> trade”.
>
> - Frassanito Network, Europe (589): “What is wrong with the current
> anti-trafficking politics? A migrants’ and labour rights perspective
> for a new European agenda
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1659>“.
>
> Seminar 8: *Migrants and Development*
>
> - FORIM, France (565): “Migrations et développement : pour une
> reconnaissance de l’apport des migrants dans l’enrichissement des pays
> d’accueil et dans le processus de développement des pays du Sud “
>
> - Droits Devant !, France (534) : “Apport des migrants et sans papiers
> dans le développement des Pays les Moins Avancés (PMA) - Conséquences
> économiques et sociales des expulsions de sans papiers
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1114>“
>
> - Forum social d’Aubervilliers, France (556) : “La place des migrants
> dans la conception du développement, dans leur pays d'origine comme
> dans leur pays d'accueil
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1345>“.
>
> *Assembly on Migrations: *“Collective proposal from the network of
> migrations”
>
> * *
>
> *_Seminar that can be held specificly or be merged inside some of the
> 8 first proposals._*
>
> * Children and Minors isolated*
>
> - LDH, France (568) : “Mineurs migrants, accueil et difficultés
> sociales“.
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=864>
>
> - Stop Deporting Children, England (535) : “Building a mass movement
> in defence of refugee rights in Europe“.**
>
>
> * _Proposals which should be more defined_*
>
> *_ _*- Gruppo Abele, Italy (567): “Migratory politics: Italy, like
> other European countries, plays dirty. While international merchants
> of human beings prepare their weapons, avoiding controls and opening
> new ways to import clandestine immigrants in Europe through the
> Mediterranean area” (Proposed to be merged with sem. 1).
>
> - Ospaaal-solidaridad : “Foro Social Mundial de las Migraciones
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1517>”
> (Workshop).
>
> - Confederazione – cobas, Italy (539) : “Diritti dei migranti e degli
> asilanti in Europa, libera circolazione, accoglienza, cittadinanza,
> chiusura CPT
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1518>”
> (Proposed to be merged with sem.1,3,4,5).
>
> - Coordination maree noire
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2152&&acti_list=acti_list>,
> France (542): “Emigration et Méditerranée, aspects maritimes“
> (Proposed to be merged with sem. 1).
>
> - ARCI, Italy (698) : “ Building bridges of Eastern and Western
> European civil society: meeting to help mutual knowledge and relations
> “.
>
> - Young flame youth magazine
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2545&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (576): “Problems of Immigrant Youth in Europe
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1593>“.
>
> - Initiatives pour un autre monde, France (557): “ La question des
> migrations internationales dans la processus des forum “.
>
> - Anitza (553) : “Inmigración en la UE e interculturalidad; sanidad“
> (Proposed to be merged with sem. 4).
>
>
> *_Seminars that may belong and can be more easily merged at the
> thematic area for discrimination and anti-racism, extreme right_*
>
> *_ _*- Day-mer turkish and kurdish community centre, Turkey (569):
> “Models for the Interaction of Peoples: Integration and/or
> Multiculturalism?
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1200>”.
>
> - Youth against racism in europe
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2530&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (588) : ”The Road to Omonoia" - campaign for compensation to the
> victims of racist killer Pantelis Kazakos”.
>
> - 1990 trust
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2271&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (587) : ” The importance of the recognition of ethnicity - lessons
> from France
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1212>”
> (Can be merged in one seminar).
>
> - Antiracist initiative of thessaloniki
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2568&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (583) : ” Social exclusion of migrants's descendents
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1672>”.
>
> - Fédération des travailleur immigrés de france (fgif)
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2550&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (559) : ”Le racisme et la revolte des immigres en France ” (Can be
> merged in one seminar).
>
> - European confederation of oppressed immigrants
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2548&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (579) : ” Racism in Europe and the Immigrants' Revolt
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1610>”
> (Can be merged in one seminar).
>
> - Young struggle
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2542&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (577): “Problems of immigrant youth in Europe and the Revolt in Paris
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> viewactivities.php?activity_id=1615>“(Can be merged in one seminar).
>
> - Igif-federation of immigrant workers
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2559&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (554) : “Institutionalisation of Racism in Switzerland, Blocher and
> Immigrants“.
>
> - Agif (555) : “Institutionalised Racism in Germany
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1598>“. > __
>
>
> *Seminars about anti-terror laws*
>
> - Agif (533): “Anti-terror Laws and the Immigrants in Germany
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1597>“
> (proposed to be merged in one seminar or to be merged with other
> seminars from the thematic areas of migration or repression).
>
> - European confederation of oppressed immigrants
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2548&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (584) : “Terror Laws in Europe and the Immigrants
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> viewactivities.php?activity_id=1609>“(proposed to be merged in one
> seminar or to be merged with other seminars from the thematic areas of
> migration or repression).
>
> *Seminars about immigrant woman*
>
> - Aveg-kon women commission
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2543&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (573): “Problems of immigrant women in Europe and their place in the
> struggle
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> viewactivities.php?activity_id=1595>“(proposed to be merged in one
> seminar about immigrant woman or to be merged with other seminars from
> the thematic areas of migration or alternativiste feministe).
>
> - Refugee workers cultural association women's committee
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2531&&acti_list=acti_list>
> : “Problems of Immigrant Women In Europe
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1555> “
> (proposed to be merged in one seminar about immigrant woman or to be
> merged with other seminars from the thematic areas of migration or
> alternativiste feministe).
>
> - Agif (574): “Problems of immigrant women in Germany and their place
> in the struggle
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1599>”
> (proposed to be merged in one seminar about immigrant woman or to be
> merged with other seminars from the thematic areas of migration or
> alternativiste feministe.)
>
> - Fédération des travailleur immigrés de france (595): “Les problemes
> des femmes immigrées et leur place dans la lutte” (fgif (proposed to
> be merged in one seminar about immigrant woman or to be merged with
> other seminars from the thematic areas of migration or alternativiste
> feministe).
>
> - Igif-federation of immigrant workers
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2559&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (575): “Problems of Immigrant Women in Switzerland and their place in
> the struggle
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1647>“
> (proposed to be merged in one seminar about immigrant woman or to be
> merged with other seminars from the thematic areas of migration or
> alternativiste feministe).__
>
> *_Seminars from other thematic areas that can be merged with these
> seminars_*
>
> *_ _*- Confederazione generale italiana del lavoro
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2467&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (45- area :democracy and fundamental rights) : “Global rights through
> citizenship for migrants and UN Convention ratification
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1454>”
> (Proposed to be merged with sem. 5 or 6).
>
> - Confederation of Trade Unions of Public Sector Workers in Turkey
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2184&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (101-area discrimination): “Rising nationalism, migrant problems and
> labor organizations
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/viewactivities.php?activity_id=1015>“
> (Proposed to be merged with sem. 6).
>
> - Housing and land rights network
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> organisation_profile_forlist.php?orgains_id=2279&&acti_list=acti_list>
> (564) : “Migrants and Stateless Persons-Europe and the Levant
> <http://workspace.fse-esf.org/
> viewactivities.php?activity_id=1219>“(Proposed to be merged with sem.
> 4)
>
>
> *Report of the meeting held in Frankfurt EN -FR - IT *
>
> EN
>
> The agenda of the meeting:
>
> 1. Programme proposal and merging process
>
> 2. Organization of the thematic space during the Forum
>
> 3. Assembly on migrations
>
> 4. Events
>
> 5. Common Agenda
>
>
> *About forty people coming from 11 countries* participated in the
> meeting.
>
> *1. **PROGRAMME*
>
> In accordance with the methodology of the Forum, *the Migration group
> has three European facilitators *: Filippo Miraglia (ARCI- Italy) ;
> Marine Gacem (IPAM/CRID- France) and Nickos Nikisianis (Anti-racism
> network, Thessalonique – Greece).
>
> The debates of the Migrations groups started from the merging proposal
> made by the facilitators (see, at the end of the message*, the table
> in which all the proposals for seminars* *can be found).*
>
> _Methodological issues_: in the table, the proposals set down on the
> website are distributed among the titles of the thematic seminars
> accepted during the last European Preparatory Assembly in Vienna.
> *None of the themes of seminars are disconnected from the proposals
> made on the website, and no proposal has been eliminated or excluded
> from the merging proposal*.
>
> The group has decided to propose at least *8 seminars and 1 assembly*
> (among which one seminar divided up in two slots). To this number of 8
> should be added the seminars which have not yet merged through lack of
> precision or proposals.
>
> * The eight thematic seminars proposed are as follows :* (the titles
> only indicate the content, the final titles will be discussed with
> those who organize the seminars).
>
> 1. European and National policies on borders control, externalisation,
> expulsion, detention camps and the freedom of movement and settlement
> (2 slots)
>
> 2. Right of Asylum
>
> 3. Legalisation, fighting for papers for all.
>
> 4. Social rights: access to social services, public education, health
> and housing
>
> 5. Political rights and citizenship
>
> 6. Labour and migration
>
> 7. Human trafficking
>
> 8. Migrants and development
>
> The choice of the group is explained as follows:
>
> Too small a number of seminars might *turn them into plenaries *(since
> the last three European Preparatory Assemblies, the group has been
> against holding plenaries)
>
> Holding too many seminars would inevitably result *in splitting up the
> networks and the themes under discussion*. The groups and themes might
> be in competition, although they are close to each other.
>
> The forum is not an end in itself and the purpose is *to work together
> and meet with many organizations *in order to create or reinforce the
> European networks. In order to facilitate this objective, it seems
> necessary to set up seminars grouping together a number of
> organizations coming from several countries.
>
> Finally, it was recalled that many organizations working on this
> themes are small, not wealthy, and cannot *afford to set up too many
> seminars because of the costs.*
>
> However, the method adopted is based upon *voluntary merging*, which
> means that no merging will be imposed. Once the merging proposals are
> distributed, groups and associations should announce either they agree
> or disagree about the merging. In case they disagree, they should
> point out their preference and projects. For that, could you please
> contact the above-mentioned facilitators.
>
> Once the agreements and disagreements are expressed, a coordinator
> should be selected for each thematic seminar. This coordinator will be
> in charge of:
>
> *- enlarging and reinforcing the representativeness of the debates*
> (by encouraging organizations coming from different countries to
> participate and by dealing with the demands of groups who have not yet
> put their proposals on the website but who wish to participate in a
> specific seminar).
>
> *- organizing the seminar* in concrete terms (in particular, by
> furthering various interventions : women, men, migrants, research
> workers, activists, and by fixing the speaking time)
>
> *- finding the title which will illustrate the key issues of the
> seminar*
>
> - * contributing towards an understanding of the event.*
>
> - *writing a few lines after the seminar* to explain the findings in
> order to present them during the Assembly on migrations and fill out
> the final text of the thematic on migrations.
>
> *Organizations are no more allowed to set down new proposals of
> seminars. *On the other hand,* *they can contact one of the
> coordinating* *organizations* so* that they can participate in the
> seminars announced. For each proposal of seminars registered, it can
> be made more precise in particular by putting on the website the list
> of partners associated to the seminar.
>
> *_As for the proposals which are not yet merged_* : the organizations
> whose proposals are not yet listed should declare if they wish :
>
> - to have their proposals merge within one of the 8 themes selected,
>
> - to merge with seminars having other thematic areas (such as the one
> on « racism », « basic rights », « poverty, job insecurity, exclusion
> » … »),
>
> - to merge with other seminars in order to set up a new thematic
> seminar,
>
> - get out of the merging proposals to set up the seminar with their
> own partners. **
>
> It is up to the Greek Committee to take the final decision but we
> would like to draw their attention on the fact *that a great number of
> merging was already done to get to this result. *
>
> * We also wish to remind the wish of the Migrations group not to
> multiply the total number of seminars and, in particular, to avoid
> setting up too many seminars on the same topic in order to avoid
> fragmentation and lack of visibility. *
>
> _In concrete terms_: the three facilitators of the group will send on
> the general EFS list the list of merging proposals and wait for
> people’s reactions. They will then make proposals for the nomination
> of coordinators. If there is no opposition, the decision will be
> validated and the coordinators will start contacting people.
>
> * 2. SPACES*
>
> As we did in Vienna, we reaffirm our position:* all the people,
> groups, organizations, communities working on migrations should be
> placed in the same space. *No physical separation.* *In the common
> space, we wish there were no *political parties* as such, but we agree
> about accepting the presence of « friend » organizations as long as
> they are not directly political parties. The rules should be clearly
> pointed out to avoid an imbalance between the organizations linked to
> the social movement and those linked to a party. The latter have
> generally more means and material to display.
>
> We think it is up to the Greek Committee to organize the physical
> space of the Forum. We just want to present some of our needs and
> constraints:
>
> *- The physical spaces should not take up strictly speaking the
> thematic areas.* To avoid fragmentation and facilitate the formation
> of collective networks and initiatives during the forum, and
> especially after, it is essential to allow transversal operations.
> Therefore, the Migrants network would like to be connected with the «
> precariousness, poverty, exclusion », « Racism, discrimination », «
> Urban spaces » networks and the in-autonomous space. These networks
> have been joined and agree with this demand
>
> This choice of being grouped together is based on a few observations:
>
> - Closely related topics and people concerned by the difficulties,
>
> - Closely related experience of militancy and struggle,
>
> - The need of transversal exchange, in particular as concerns the
> preparation of actions and initiatives during and after the EFS,
>
> - The need to mutualize the tools, costs and co-organization of space.
>
> A few people from the group are ready to bring the Greek Committee a
> practical help in the preparation of these physical spaces.
>
> *3. **MIGRANTS ASSEMBLY :*
>
> The assembly will be organized by the Migration network of the social
> forum with the participation of all the organizations involved in the
> preparation of the thematic seminars. They will also be supported by
> all the groups concerned by these themes within the forum.
>
> In order to allow both organizations and networks working on the
> subject and the migrants and communities themselves to participate in
> concrete terms in this assembly, we propose to organize it as follows > :
>
> - An invitation taking up partly the text of the call for the main
> line of migration within the EFS (which has been signed by many
> organizations and networks) will be distributed,
>
> - At the beginning of the assembly, the coordinators of the seminars
> will rapidly introduce the findings and prospects drawn by those who
> participated in the seminars, so that a text could be worked out.
>
> - After this presentation, the first to intervene will be the migrants
> and groups of migrants and, if there is some time left, the other
> organizations will express themselves.
>
> A minimum of 3 hours slot should be provided for this assembly. It
> should be scheduled on the Saturday, at the end of the morning or
> during lunch hour before the demonstration so that the migrants who
> work could participate.
>
> * **4. BIG EVENTS *
>
> - the group agrees to the proposal to organize an opening concert on
> the theme of anti-racism but they emphasize their will that slogans
> concerning the theme of migrations appear in the title and on the
> posters. They also agree on the idea of people intervening
> successively between the music groups, it being understood that these
> people will originate from the whole Europe and will be migrants
> themselves as a priority.
>
> - the group reaffirms its intention of organizing a specific action
> such as, for example, a demonstration in front of a detention center
> or in front of a place symbolizing the treatment applied to
> foreigners*. This specific operation should be put on the agenda*.
>
> - the group plans to organize a meeting near the Omania Square before
> the starting signal of the demonstration of Saturday afternoon with
> the migrants present in Athens, the idea being to get back all
> together to the demonstration.
>
> * **5. COMMON AGENDAS AND CAMPAIGNS *
>
> As concerns the group, this collective work should fit into the
> overall dynamic movement from Bamako Forum (FSM 2006) to Nairobi (FSM
> 2007) after Athens (EFS 2006) and Madrid (FSMM 2006). A number of
> initiatives are proposed in order to maintain the link :
>
> - Distribute and sign the « Call of Bamako for dignity and respect of
> migrants » which plans to organize, among others, an international day
> of mobilization. It recalls the fact that the next summit between the
> European Union and the African Union which will take place in Spring
> 2006 might be the first step of this mobilization
>
> *Conclusion *
>
> - Many groups who participate in the Migrations network wish to draw
> people’s attention on the difficulty of obtaining visas for political
> refugees coming, in particular, from Palestine and Turkey, but also
> for immigrants or people living in countries out of the Schengen area
>
> - It was also recalled that there is a need to provide for financial
> assistance allowing migrants and basic groups to come. It was
> specified that such assistance should not only concern people coming
> from Eastern countries but also from Western Europe
>
> *Next meetings*:
>
> - EFS Programme Group: 1st and 2nd April 2006 in Athens.
>
> - Migrations Groups: for those who can arrive before the official
> opening of the ESF, we propose to meet on Wednesday the 3^rd in Athens
> in order to discuss about the last organizational details
>
> Marine Gacem, Nikos Nikisianis, 6^th March 2006
> _Mail address in order to join the facilitators:_
>
> Marine Gacem : ep3 at reseau-ipam.org
>
> Nickos Nickisianis : nnikisia at bio.auth.gr
>
> Filippo Miraglia : miraglia at arci.it
>
> *******************************
>
> FR
>
> Ordre du jour :
>
> 1. Proposition de programme et processus de fusion
> 2. Aménagement de l’espace physique lors du Forum
> 3. Assemblée des migrations
> 4. Evénements
> 5. Agenda commun
>
> La réunion a réuni une *quarantaine de personnes venues de 11 pays*.
>
> *1. **PROGRAMME*
>
> En accord avec la méthodologie du forum, le groupe Migration a *trois
> facilitateurs européens* Filippo Miraglia (ARCI- Italie) ; Marine
> Gacem (IPAM/CRID- France) et Nickos Nikisianis (Réseau anti-racisme
> Thessalonique – Grèce).
>
> La discussion du réseau Migrations a débuté à partir de la proposition
> de fusion réalisée par les facilitateurs. (Voir le* tableau regroupant
> l’ensemble des propositions de séminaires* en fin de message).
>
> _Point méthodologique_ : le tableau présenté organise les propositions
> déposées sur le site web au sein des intitulés de séminaires
> thématiques retenus lors de la dernière AEP de Vienne. *Aucun thème de
> séminaires n’est déconnecté des propositions faites sur le site et
> aucune proposition n’a été éliminée ou exclue du processus de fusion*.
>
> Le groupe a décidé de proposer *au moins 8 séminaires et 1 assemblée*
> (dont un séminaire réparti sur deux plages horaires. A ce nombre de 8
> doivent s’ajouter les séminaires qui ne sont pas encore fusionnés par
> manque de précision ou de propositions)
>
> *Voici les 8 séminaires thématiques proposés :*
>
> (les titres ne sont que des indications de contenu…le titre final sera
> discuté avec les organisateurs du séminaire)
>
> 1. European and National policies on borders control, externalisation,
> expulsion, detention camps and the freedom of movement and settlement
> (2 plages horaire- 2 slots)
>
> 2. Right of Asylum
>
> 3. Legalisation, fighting for papers for all.
>
> 4. Social rights: access to social services, public education, health
> and housing
>
> 5. Political rights and citizenship
>
> 6. Labour and migration
>
> 7. Human trafficking
>
> 8. Migrants and development
>
> Le groupe motive son choix ainsi :
>
> - Un trop petit nombre de séminaires risquerait de les *transformer en
> plénières* (depuis les trois dernières AEP le groupe s’est opposé à la
> tenue de plénières)
>
> - La tenue d’un trop grand nombre de séminaires entraînerait forcément
> une *fragmentation des réseaux et des thèmes abordés*. Cela mettrait
> en concurrence des groupes et thématiques proches.
>
> - Le forum n’étant pas une fin en soi, ce qui est recherché est le
> *travail collectif et la rencontre avec de nombreuses organisations
> *afin de créer ou consolider les réseaux européens. Pour faciliter
> cela il semble nécessaire d’organiser des séminaires regroupant
> plusieurs organisations venant de plusieurs pays.
>
> - Enfin, il a été rappelé que beaucoup d’organisations travaillant sur
> cette thématique sont de petites organisations, peu fortunées qui ne
> peuvent se permettre de *multiplier la tenue de séminaires en raison
> de leur coût*.
>
> La méthode adoptée est cependant fondée sur les *fusions volontaires*,
> ce qui signifie qu’aucune fusion ne sera imposé. Après diffusion des
> propositions de fusion, les groupes et associations doivent faire
> connaître leur accord pour la fusion ou leur désaccord. En cas de
> désaccord, elles doivent indiquer leur préférence et leurs projets.
> Pour cela merci de joindre les facilitateurs indiqués plus haut.
>
> Une fois les accords et désaccords exprimés, un coordinateur doit être
> choisi pour chaque séminaire thématique. Ce coordinateur aura la
> charge de :
>
> - *ouvrir et renforcer la représentativité des débats* (en suscitant
> la participation d’organisations venues de différents pays et en
> traitant les demandes de groupes n’ayant pas déposé de propositions
> sur le web mais souhaitant participer à un séminaire précis)
>
> - *organiser concrètement le séminaire* (en favorisant notamment les
> interventions variées : femmes, hommes, migrants, chercheurs,
> activistes…et en organisant les temps de parole.)
>
> - *trouver le titre illustrant les enjeux qui seront abordés dans le
> séminaire*
>
> *- aider à la visibilité de l’événement *
>
> - *écrire après le séminaire quelques lignes* expliquant les résultats
> obtenus pour les présenter lors de l’Assemblée des migrations et
> alimenter le texte final de la thématique migration.
>
> *Il n’est plus possible pour une organisation de déposer de nouvelles
> propositions de séminaires. *Il est en revanche possible de contacter
> une des organisations coordinatrices pour participer aux séminaires
> annoncés. Pour les séminaires déjà enregistrés, il devrait pouvoir
> être possible de les affiner notamment en inscrivant sur le site la
> liste des partenaires associés au séminaire.
>
> *_Pour les propositions non encore fusionnées_* : les organisations
> ayant fait des propositions non classées doivent dire si elles
> souhaitent
>
> - voir leurs propositions fusionner dans l’un des 8 thèmes retenus,
>
> - fusionner avec des séminaires d’autres aires thématiques (comme
> celle sur le « racisme… », « les droits fondamentaux… », « la
> pauvreté, précarité,exclusion »…),
>
> - fusionner avec d’autres groupes pour créer un nouveau séminaire
> thématique,
>
> - sortir des propositions de fusion pour réaliser soi même le
> séminaire avec ses partenaires.
>
> La décision finale sur le programme revient au comité grec mais nous
> voulons attirer son attention sur le fait que *le résultat obtenu a
> déjà nécessité beaucoup de fusion !*
>
> *Nous voulons aussi rappeler le souhait du groupe Migrations de ne pas
> multiplier le nombre total de séminaires et notamment d’éviter la
> multiplication des séminaires sur un même sujet afin d’éviter la
> fragmentation et le manque de visibilité. *
>
> _Concrètement_ : les trois facilitateurs du groupe vont envoyer sur la
> liste générale du FSE la liste des propositions de fusion et attendre
> les réactions. Ensuite, ils feront des propositions de nominations des
> coordinateurs… si pas d’opposition on valide et les coordinateurs
> commencent à contacter les uns et autres.
>
> *2. **ESPACES *
>
> Comme à Vienne, nous réaffirmons notre position : *l’ensemble des
> personnes, groupes, organisations, communautés travaillant sur les
> migrations doivent être placés au même endroit*. Pas de séparation
> physique. Dans l’espace commun nous ne souhaitons pas la présence *de
> partis politiques* en tant que tel mais sommes d’accord pour accepter
> la présence d’organisations « amies » dès lors qu’elles ne sont pas
> directement partis politiques. Des règles doivent être clairement
> affichées pour éviter une présence déséquilibrée entre les
> organisations du mouvement social et les organisations liées à un
> parti, lesquelles ont généralement plus de moyen et de matériel à
> exposer.
>
> Nous pensons que l’organisation concrète de l’espace physique du forum
> revient au comité grec. Nous présentons simplement quelqu’un de nos
> besoin et contraintes :
>
> *- les espaces physiques ne doivent pas reprendre stricto sensus les
> aires thématique*. Pour éviter la fragmentation et faciliter la
> construction de réseau et d’initiatives collectives durant le forum et
> surtout après il est capital de permettre la transversalité. C’est
> pourquoi le réseau Migrants souhaite être connecté avec les réseaux «
> précarité, pauvreté, exclusion » ; « Racisme, discrimination », «
> Urban spaces » et l’espace in-autonome. Ces réseaux ont été contactés
> et partagent cette demande.
>
> Ce choix de regroupement physique repose sur plusieurs constats :
>
> - proximité des sujets abordés et des personnes concernées par les
> difficultés
>
> - proximité des pratiques de militance et de lutte
>
> - nécessité des échanges transversaux notamment pour préparer les
> actions et initiatives collectives durant le FSE et après.
>
> - nécessité de mutualiser les outils, les coûts et la co-organisation
> de l’espace.
>
> Plusieurs personnes du groupe sont disponibles pour apporter au comité
> grec une aide concrète dans la préparation de ces espaces physiques.
>
> *3. **Assemblée des migrants :*
>
> L’assemblée sera organisée par le réseau Migration du forum social
> avec la participation de toutes les organisations impliquées dans la
> préparation des séminaires thématiques. Mais aussi avec le soutien de
> tous les groupes impliqué dans le forum sur cette thématique.
>
> Pour permettre à la fois aux organisations et réseau travaillant sur
> le sujet et aux migrants et communautés eux même de participer
> concrètement à cette assemblée nous proposons de l’organiser de la
> façon suivante :
>
> - Diffusion d’une invitation reprenant en partie le texte de l’appel
> pour un axe migrations dans le fse qui a été signé par de nombreuses
> organisations et réseaux ;
>
> - les coordinateurs des séminaires présenteront en quelques minutes au
> début de l’assemblée les résultats et perspectives dégagés par les
> participants aux séminaires afin de permettre l’élaboration d’un texte
> de l’assemblée des migrations.
>
> - Après cette présentation, les premiers intervenants seront les
> migrants et groupe de migrants et s’il reste du temps les autres
> organisations qui souhaiteront s’exprimer.
>
> Il faut prévoir au minimum une plage horaire de 3 heures pour cette
> assemblée.
>
> Il serait bien d’organiser cette assemblée le samedi plutôt en fin de
> matinée ou au temps de midi avant la manifestation pour que les
> migrants qui travaillent puissent y participer.
>
> 4. *Grands Evénements :*
>
> - le groupe accueille positivement la proposition d’organiser un
> concert d’ouverture sur le thème de l’anti-racisme…mais souligne sa
> volonté qu’apparaisse dans le titre et sur les affiches des slogans
> concernant aussi la thématique des Migrations. Il est d’accord sur
> l’idée d’une succession d’intervenants entre les groupes de musique
> étant entendu que les intervenants seront issus de toute l’Europe et
> qu’ils seront en priorité les migrants eux même.
>
> - Il réitère son intention d’organiser une action spécifique comme par
> exemple une manifestation devant un camp de détention ou devant un
> lieu symbolisant le traitement réservé aux étrangers. *Cette action
> spécifique doit être inscrite au programme.*
>
> - il planifie d’organiser un rassemblement prés de la place Omonia
> avant le départ de la manifestation du samedi après midi avec les
> migrants présents à Athènes. L’idée étant de rejoindre ensuite tous
> ensemble la manifestation.
>
> *5. **Agenda commun et campagnes*
>
> Pour le groupe, ce travail collectif doit s’inscrire dans la dynamique
> d’ensemble des Forums de Bamako (FSM 2006) à Nairobi (FSM 2007) en
> passant par Athènes (FSE 2006) et Madrid (FSMM 2006). Afin de
> maintenir le lien plusieurs initiatives sont proposées :
>
> - Faire circuler et signer l’ « appel de Bamako pour la dignité et le
> respect des migrants » qui prévoit notamment une journée
> internationale de mobilisation. Il évoque le fait que le prochain
> sommet entre l’Union Européenne et l’Union Africaine qui aura lieu au
> printemps 2006 pourrait être la première étape de cette mobilisation.
> *Conclusion *:
>
> - De nombreux groupes présents dans le réseau Migrations souhaitent
> attirer l’attention sur la difficulté d’obtenir des visa pour les
> réfugiés politiques venant notamment de Palestine et de Turquie, mais
> aussi pour les personnes immigrés ou non résidant dans des pays hors
> zone schengen.
>
> - Il a été rappelé également la nécessité d’aider financière pour la
> venue des migrants et groupes de base. Il a été précisé que cette aide
> ne devait pas seulement concernée les personnes venant des pays de
> l’est mais aussi des pays de l’Europe de l’Ouest.
>
> Prochaines réunions :
>
> - Groupe Programme du FSE: les 1 et 2 avril 2006 à Athènes.
>
> - Groupe Migrations : pour ceux qui peuvent arriver avant l’ouverture
> officielle du FSE nous proposons de nous retrouver le mercredi 3 mai à
> Athènes pour discuter
> des derniers détails de l’organisation.
>
> Marine Gacem, Nikos Nikisianis, 6 mars 2006
>
> _Coordonnées mail pour contacter les facilitateurs :_
>
> Marine Gacem : ep3 at reseau-ipam.org
>
> Nickos Nickisianis : nnikisia at bio.auth.gr
>
> Filippo Miraglia : miraglia at arci.it
>
> ********************************
> IT
>
> Report Gruppo Immigrazione
>
> Ordine del Giorno :
>
> 1. Proposta di programma e processo di fusione
> 2. Sistemazione dello spazio fisico durante il Forum
> 3. Assemblea sulle migrazioni
> 4. Eventi
> 5. Agenda comune
>
> La riunione ha visto la partecipazione di *una quarantina di persone
> provenienti da 11 paesi*.
>
> *1. **PROGRAMMA*
>
> In accordo con al metodologia del Forum, il gruppo Migrazioni ha *tre
> facilitatori europei* Filippo Miraglia (ARCI- Italia) ; Marine Gacem
> (IPAM/CRID- Francia) e Nickos Nikisianis (Rete anti-razzista di
> Salonicco – Grecia).
>
> La discussione della rete Migrazioni ha iniziato i lavori a partire
> dalla proposta di fusione da parte dei facilitatori. (Vedi* tavola
> delle proposte seminariali* allegata).
>
> _Metodologia_ : la tavola riassume le proposte caricate sul sito
> all’interno delle aree tematiche concordate nel corso dell’ultimo AEP
> di Vienna. *Nessun argomento dei seminari è estraneo alle proposte
> fatte sul sito e nessuna proposta è stata eliminata o esclusa dal
> processo di fusione.*
>
> Il gruppo ha deciso di proporre *almeno 8 seminari ed un’assemblea*
> (dei quali, un seminario suddiviso su due fasce orarie. A questi 8
> seminari bisogna aggiungere quelli che ancora non sono stati accorpati
> per mancanza di precisione o per assenza di proposte in merito)
>
> *Ecco gli 8 seminari tematici proposti:*
>
> (le denominazioni servono solo per riassumerne il contenuto…i titoli
> definitivi saranno concordati con l’organizzatore del seminario)
>
> 1. Politiche europee e nazionali di controllo alle frontiere,
> esternalizzazione, espulsione, campi di detenzione e libertà di
> movimento e stanziamento (2 sessioni)2. Diritto d’asilo3.
> Regolarizzazione, la lotta per i documenti per tutti 4. Diritti
> sociali: accesso ai servizi sociali, all’istruzione pubblica, alla
> sanità e alla casa5. Diritti politici e cittadinanaza6. Occupazione e
> migrazione7. Tratta di persone8. Migranti e sviluppo
>
> Il gruppo motiva la propria scelta come segue :
>
> - Un numero troppo esiguo di seminari, rischierebbe di *trasformarli
> in assemblee plenarie* (dagli ultimi tre AEP il gruppo si è opposto
> all’organizzazione di plenarie)
>
> - Un numero eccessivo di seminari avrebbe provocato la *frammentazione
> delle reti e dei temi affrontati*. Ciò metterebbe in concorrenza
> gruppi vicini e tematiche affini.
>
> - Il forum non è fine a se stesso, ma orientato alla ricerca di un
> *lavoro collettivo e di un incontro con le numerose organizzazioni*
> per creare o consolidare le reti europee. Per facilitare ciò, appare
> necessario organizzare seminari che raggruppino più organizzazioni
> provenienti da differenti paesi.
>
> - Infine, è stato ricordato che molte delle organizzazioni che
> lavorano sulle tematiche in questione, sono piccole organizzazioni,
> con scarsa capacità economica e quindi non in grado di *moltiplicare
> il numero dei seminari* a causa dei costi che ciò comporterebbe.
>
> Il metodo adottato è stato quindi quello delle *fusioni volontarie*,
> ciò significa che nessuna fusione verrà imposta. Dopo la diffusione
> delle proposte di fusione, i gruppi e le organizzazioni dovranno
> rendere noti i loro accordi per la fusione o il mancato raggiungimento
> degli stessi. In caso di mancato accordo, le organizzazioni devono
> indicare le proprie preferenze ed i propri progetti. Si prega quindi
> di contattare i facilitatori sopraindicati.
>
> Una volta comunicati accordi e disaccordi, bisogna scegliere un
> coordinatore per ogni seminario tematico. Il coordinatore sarà
> incaricato di:
>
> - *aprire i dibattiti e rafforzarne la rappresentatività *(stimolando
> la partecipazione di organizzazioni provenienti da paesi differenti e
> cercando di rispondere alle esigenze dei gruppi che non hanno
> formulato le proprie proposte sul sito, ma che desiderano partecipare
> ad un seminario preciso)
>
> - *organizzare concretamente il seminario* (favorendo una certa
> varietà negli interventi : donne, uomini, migranti, ricercatori,
> attivisti… organizzando la tempistica delle parole.)
>
> - *trovare un titolo che corrisponda agli argomenti che verranno
> affrontati nel seminario*
>
> *- favorire la visibilità dell’evento *
>
> - *scrivere qualche riga dopo il seminario* esponendo i risultati
> conseguiti poi presentare il tutto all’Assemblea sulle migrazioni e
> contribuire al testo finale relativo alla tematica delle migrazioni.
>
> *Non è più possibile per le organizzazioni fare nuove proposte per i
> seminari. *E’ invece possibile contattare una delle organizzazioni
> coordinatrici per partecipare ai seminari concordati. Per i seminari
> già registrati, dovrà essere possibile specificarli ulteriormente,
> annotando sul sito la lista dei partner associati al seminario stesso.
>
> *_Per le proposte non ancora accorpate_* : le organizzazioni, avendo
> presentato proposte non classificate devono comunicare se desiderano :
>
> - Accorpare la propria proposta ad uno degli 8 temi concordati,
>
> - Fondere la propria proposta con seminari appartenenti ad altre aree
> tematiche (come quella relativa a « razzismo… », « i diritti
> fondamentali… », « la povertà, precarietà esclusione »…),
>
> - Fondersi con altri gruppi per creare nuovi seminari tematici,
>
> - Non accogliere la proposta di fusione per realizzare autonomamente
> il seminario con i propri partner.
>
> La decisione finale sul programma spetta al comitato greco ma vogliamo
> porre l’accento sul fatto che *il prodotto ottenuto finora è già
> frutto di molte fusioni !*
>
> *Vogliamo ricordare anche l’auspicio del gruppo Migrazioni di non
> accrescere il numero totale dei seminari ed in particolare di evitare
> la moltiplicazione di seminari sullo stesso tema, per non incorrere
> nel problema della frammentazione e della mancanza di visibilità. *
>
> _Concretamente_ : i tre facilitatori dei gruppi stanno per inviare
> sulla base della lista generale del FSE la lista delle proposte di
> fusione e attenderanno le reazioni. Poi, faranno delle proposte per la
> nomina dei coordinatori… se non incontreranno obiezioni, confermeranno
> i coordinatori e cominceranno a contattarli.
>
>
> *2. **SPAZI *
>
> Come a Vienna, affermiamo nuovamente la nostra posizione : *l’insieme
> di persone, gruppi, organizzazioni, comunità che lavorano nell’ambito
> delle migazioni, devono essere collocate nello stesso posto*. Niente
> separazione fisica. Nello spazio comune, non vogliamo la presenza di
> partiti politici in quanto tali, ma siamo d’accordo di accettare la
> presenza di organizzazioni « amiche » che non siano direttamente
> partiti politici. Le regole devono essere definite chiaramente per
> evitare una presenza non equilibrata tra le organizzazioni dei
> movimenti sociali e quelle legate ai partiti, le quali hanno
> generalmente più mezzi e più materiale da esporre.
>
> Pensiamo che l’organizzazione concreta dello spazio fisico competa al
> comitato greco. Esprimiamo semplicemente alcuni nostri bisogni ed
> alcuni vincoli :
>
> *- gli spazi fisici non devono corrispondere strettamente alle aree
> tematiche*. Per evitare la frammentazione e favorire la costruzione di
> reti e di iniziative collettive durante il forum e soprattutto dopo il
> forum, è di fondamentale importanza consentire la trasversalità.
>
> La scelta dei raggruppamenti fisici deve tenere conto di molteplici
> constatazioni :
>
> - affinità di temi trattati e persone sensibili a tali problematiche
>
> - affinità di pratiche di militanza e di lotta
>
> - necessità di scambi trasversali in particolare per preparare le
> azioni collettive durante e dopo il FSE.
>
> - necessità di condividere le attrezzature, i costi e la
> co-organizzazione degli spazi.
>
> Numerose persone dei gruppi hanno dato la propria disponibilità al
> comitato greco per un aiuto concreto nella preparazione degli spazi
> fisici in questione.
>
> *3. **Assemblea dei migranti e delle migranti:*
>
> L’assemblea sarà organizzata dalla Migrazioni del forum sociale con la
> partecipazione di tutte le organizzazioni coinvolte nella preparazione
> dei seminari tematici. Ma anche con l’apporto di tutti i gruppi
> coinvolti nel forum su questa tematica. Per consentire la
> partecipazione a questa assemblea sia delle organizzazioni e delle
> reti che lavorano sul tema dei migranti e delle comunità stesse, noi
> proponiamo di organizzarla nel modo seguente :
>
> - Diffusione di un invito che riprenda in parte il testo dell’appello
> per un asse sulle migrazioni nel FSE, firmato da molte organizzazioni
> e reti;
>
> - I coordinatori dei seminari presenteranno in pochi minuti all’inizio
> dell’assemblea risultati e prospettive emersi dai partecipanti e dalle
> partecipanti ai seminari, per permettere l’elaborazione di un testo
> dell’assemblea sulle migrazioni.
>
> - Dopo questa presentazione, i primi ad intervenire saranno i migranti
> e le migranti ed i gruppi di migranti e, qualora rimanesse tempo, le
> altre organizzazioni che desiderano intervenire.
>
> Bisogna prevedere una durata minima di 3 ore per l’assemblea
>
> Sarà opportuno organizzare quest’assemblea il sabato verso fine
> mattinata o verso mezzogiorno prima della manifestazione, affinché i
> migranti e le migranti che lavorano possano parteciparvi.
>
> *4. **Grandi Eventi : *
>
> - Il gruppo accoglie positivamente la proposta di organizzare un
> concerto d’apertura sul tema dell’anti-razzismo… ma sottolinea la
> propria volontà di specificare, sia nel titolo che sulle locandine,
> degli slogan che richiamino la tematica delle Migrazioni. Il gruppo è
> inoltre d’accordo relativamente all’idea di interporre degli
> interventi tra le varie esibizioni dei gruppi musicali, beninteso che
> le persone che interverranno saranno originarie di tutta l’Europa ed
> in prevalenza migranti.
>
> - Il gruppo ribadisce inoltre la propria intenzione di organizzare
> un’azione specifica come, ad esempio, una manifestazione davanti ad un
> campo di detenzione o un sit-in davanti ad un luogo simbolo dei
> trattamenti riservati agli stranieri. *Quest’azione specifica deve
> essere inserita nel programma. *
>
> - Il gruppo prevede di organizzare un raggruppamento nei pressi di
> place Omonia, dopo mezzogiorno e prima della manifestazione di sabato,
> con i migranti e le migranti presenti ad Atene. L’idea è di
> raggiungere poi tutti e tutte insieme la manifestazione..
>
> *5. **Agenda comune e campagne*
>
> Per il gruppo, questo lavoro collettivo deve iscriversi nella dinamica
> d’insieme dei Forum di Bamako (FSM 2006), di Nairobi (FSM 2007)
> passando per Atene (FSE 2006) e Madrid (FSMM 2006). Al fine di
> mantenere un legame tra le differenti iniziative è stata avanzata la
> proposta seguente:
>
> - Fare circolare e firmare l’ « appello di Bamako per la dignità ed il
> rispetto dei migranti » che prevede nello specifico una giornata di
> mobilitazione. Tale appello richiama il prossimo vertice tra Unione
> Europea ed Unione Africana che avrà luogo nella primavera 2006 e potrà
> costituire la prima tappa della mobilitazione sopra menzionata.
>
> *Conclusioni *:
>
> - Numerosi gruppi della rete delle Migrazioni desiderano attirare
> l’attenzione sulla difficoltà di ottenere visti per i rifugiati
> politici, in particolare per quelli provenienti dalla Palestina e
> dalla Turchia, ma anche per le persone immigrate o non residenti,
> provenienti dai paesi esterni all’area Schengen.
>
> - E’ stata ricordata inoltre la necessità di aiuti finanziari per la
> partecipazione di migranti e gruppi di base. E’ stato precisato che
> questi aiuti non devono essere riservati a persone provenienti da
> paesi dell’Est, ma anche a persone provenienti da paesi dell’Europa
> dell’Ovest.
>
> Prossime riunioni :
>
> - Gruppo Programma del FSE : 1 e 2 aprile 2006 ad Atene
>
> - Gruppo Migrazioni : per coloro i quali possono arrivare prima
> dell’apertura ufficiale del FSE, proponiamo di ritrovarci mercoledì 3
> maggio ad Atene per discutere gli ultimi dettagli dell’organizzazione.
>
>
> Marine Gacem, Nikos Nikisianis, 6 marzo 2006
>
>
> _Coordinate mail per contattare i facilitatori :_
>
> Marine Gacem : ep3 at reseau-ipam.org
>
> Nickos Nickisianis : nnikisia at bio.auth.gr
>
> Filippo Miraglia : miraglia at arci.it
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________
> Echanges et Partenariats
> www.echanges-partenariats.org
> 21ter rue Voltaire, 75011 Paris
> 01.43.48.62.79 fax 01.43.67.16.42
>
> _______________________________________________
> FSE-ESF mailing list
> FSE-ESF at lists.fse-esf.org
> http://lists.fse-esf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fse-esf
More information about the FSE-ESF
mailing list